阿里云2核2G3M带宽云服务器测评,99元/年可续费到2027年
阿里云可能意识到C端用户的流失情况。这次双11上线非常给力活动,云服务器仅需99元一年,续费同价!非常不错的价格!
这波应该能吸引一部分老用户回归阿里云!这个活动老用户也可参与!!
文字描述: 首先要在2023年11月活动期间,去阿里云活动页下单新购这个套餐,享受99元包1年。
同天再续费1年又享受了99元包1年;等到明年2024年11月1日之后,又可以以99元续1年;
最后等到2025年11月1日后,再来一次99元续1年;
持续操作最多可以续费3次都享受到优惠;
然后你的云服务器优惠价买的周期从2023年一直能持续到2027年了。
购买地址:https://51.ruyo.net/m6lm
下面针对这个服务器进行了简单的测试!方便大家参考!
更多内容:阿里云 / 阿里云测评 / 阿里云优惠活动汇总(长期更新)
测试IP
123.57.249.1
配置说明
CPU :2核
内存 :2G
带宽 :上行 3Mbps,下行 100Mbps
流量:不限
磁盘 :40GB
虚拟 :KVM
IP :IPv4 x 1
数据中心:国内多地机房
价格:99元/年
配置参数
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2500.000 MHz
CPU Cache : 33792 KB
AES-NI : ? Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ? Disabled
Total Disk : 39.2 GB (3.2 GB Used)
Total Mem : 1.8 GB (140.2 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 1 min
Load average : 0.17, 0.07, 0.02
OS : Alibaba Cloud Linux release 3 (Soaring Falcon)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.134-15.al8.x86_64
TCP CC : cubic
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ? Online / ? Offline
Organization : AS37963 Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co.,Ltd.
Location : Beijing / CN
Region : Beijing
磁盘IO
平均IO为 110MB/s
I/O Speed(1st run) : 111 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 111 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 110 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 110.7 MB/s
性能测试
性能跑分为:989.2
/ 1984
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: iZ2zeiyeq5zrvjj4bh4e0sZ: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 5.10.134-15.al8.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Thu Jul 20 00:44:04 CST 2023
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum (5000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum (5000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
15:22:37 up 4:24, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.05, 0.02; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 08 2023 15:22:37 - 15:50:40
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40269868.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6148.2 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3896.4 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 630193.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 173597.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1672770.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 840007.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 48576.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8096.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6663.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1263.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 449013.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40269868.8 3450.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6148.2 1117.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 3896.4 906.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 630193.6 1591.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 173597.2 1048.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1672770.7 2884.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 840007.8 675.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 48576.6 121.4
Process Creation 126.0 8096.1 642.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6663.1 1571.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1263.0 2105.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 449013.6 299.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 989.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 08 2023 15:50:40 - 16:18:45
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 80326913.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12254.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6682.5 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1082549.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 290645.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2992857.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1679015.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 381287.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19618.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9932.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1402.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 861543.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 80326913.0 6883.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12254.5 2228.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 6682.5 1554.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1082549.1 2733.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 290645.0 1756.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2992857.9 5160.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1679015.8 1349.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 381287.0 953.2
Process Creation 126.0 19618.3 1557.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9932.0 2342.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1402.4 2337.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 861543.4 574.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1984.0
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
网络延迟
线路 | 最快节点 | 最慢节点 | 平均响应 |
电信 | 河北保定9ms | 广东汕头144ms | 37.3ms |
多线 | 河南洛阳22ms | 广东广州46ms | 31.6ms |
联通 | 内蒙古呼和浩特10ms | 福建福州47ms | 29.6ms |
移动 | 江苏宿迁26ms | 陕西西安34ms | 29.7ms |
其他 | 中国台湾省53ms | 中国香港1523ms | 216.2ms |
网速测试
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 3.31 Mbps 100.41 Mbps 5.63 ms
Los Angeles, US 3.39 Mbps 111.18 Mbps 182.70 ms
Dallas, US 3.55 Mbps 4.11 Mbps 196.77 ms
Montreal, CA 3.42 Mbps 3.69 Mbps 301.93 ms
Paris, FR 3.40 Mbps 114.21 Mbps 153.41 ms
Shanghai, CN 3.32 Mbps 100.76 Mbps 25.84 ms
Chongqing, CN 3.32 Mbps 112.36 Mbps 42.32 ms
Hongkong, CN 3.42 Mbps 1.37 Mbps 55.88 ms
Mumbai, IN 3.66 Mbps 106.70 Mbps 250.71 ms
Singapore, SG 3.41 Mbps 108.81 Mbps 89.26 ms
Tokyo, JP 3.41 Mbps 0.63 Mbps 413.95 ms
DB测试
MyISAM引擎 100 并发查询时间:1.639秒
MyISAM引擎 1000并发查询时间:1.493秒
InnoDB引擎 100 并发查询时间: 0.694秒
InnoDB引擎 1000并发查询时间:0.717秒
Benchmark
Running for engine myisam
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 1.647 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.578 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.694 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 100
Average number of queries per client: 20
Benchmark
Running for engine myisam
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 1.495 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.442 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.544 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 1000
Average number of queries per client: 2
Benchmark
Running for engine innodb
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 0.582 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 0.449 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.051 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 100
Average number of queries per client: 20
Benchmark
Running for engine innodb
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 0.708 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 0.608 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 0.835 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 1000
Average number of queries per client: 2
并发测试
50KB静态页面测试 并发 ≈ 1000,平均响应时间1827毫秒
请求服务器:阿里云云服务器延迟2毫秒
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1430300 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking 123.57.xx.xx (be patient)
Server Software: nginx
Server Hostname: 123.57.xx.xx
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /50kb.html
Document Length: 51276 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1000
Time taken for tests: 84.067 seconds
Complete requests: 46
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 4720888 bytes
HTML transferred: 4573468 bytes
Requests per second: 0.55 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 1827542.848 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 1827.543 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 54.84 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 3 17 2.1 17 17
Processing: 30 5221 2106.3 4984 13821
Waiting: 3 1550 2066.3 1499 13564
Total: 33 5238 2107.0 5001 13837
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 5001
66% 5808
75% 5815
80% 5820
90% 7968
95% 7982
98% 13837
99% 13837
100% 13837 (longest request)
最后总结
以下是马甲客观评价!本文测试大概用了2天的时间!
有童鞋质疑磁盘IO限制严重?其实花大几千买的阿里云服务器大概也只有140M左右。国内建站需要备案!
服务器性能:CPU ,磁盘IO,运算能力表现能力不错。
网络情况:国内下行百兆,上行满满的3Mbps。
价格情况:讲真国内3M带宽,这个价格很不错啦。
能否建站:完全可以。
工单服务:工单还是比较快的。
商家口碑:阿里云国内数一的云服务器商,好久没看见给力的活动了。
控制面板:支持中文,支持监控统计,快照,VNC,安全组,内网互通等。
VS腾讯云
翻了翻博主关于腾讯云的测评文章,仅有 腾讯云测评:2CPU+4G内存+5M带宽香港标准型云服务器 可以对比一下!
以为以往腾讯云主要是在轻量云服务器做活动!具体对比大家可以看看数据。
这次阿里云活动服务器明显有点对标腾讯云,尤其是前俩年腾讯云推出无忧轻量应用服务器。
一起评分
经过上面的测评,你对该款型号服务器的评价怎么样呢? 😀留个客观的评分吧!
更多云服务器评分:https://51.ruyo.net/servers-rating/